Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - FAIL"):
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [xen-4.5-testing test] 103161: regressions - 
> FAIL"):
> > These leak check failures are because the XSA-195 PoC is somehow causing
> > qemu to segfault.  I cant explain why, because qemu should be involved
> > at all, and it is especially suspicious that it is only older branches
> > where this happens.
> 
> As we discussed yesterday, while this may be a real bug, I think it is
> not really a _regression_ in the sense that the osstest baseline
> version has the same bug.
> 
> I therefore propose to do a force push of 4.4 too.

I have now done this.  I force pushed this version:

osstest service owner writes ("[xen-4.4-testing test] 103240: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> flight 103240 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103240/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 20 xtf/test-hvm32-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521
>  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 42 xtf/test-hvm64-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 102521
>  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3 31 xtf/test-hvm32pae-invlpg~shadow fail REGR. vs. 
> 102521

These are expected.

>  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4       52 leak-check/check     fail REGR. vs. 102521
>  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5       52 leak-check/check     fail REGR. vs. 102521
>  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-1       52 leak-check/check     fail REGR. vs. 102521
>  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-3       52 leak-check/check     fail REGR. vs. 102521
>  test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2       52 leak-check/check     fail REGR. vs. 102521

This is the known qemu crash, see above.

>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 15 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 
> 102521

This test seems to be slightly unreliable.  It would be nice to know
why but in any case it's not a regression on the Xen 4.4 branch.

> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  149c34a6ea0c6821620554059e85cb89acf0ff8f

So pushed this.

Later flights have more failures in, which is why I picked this one.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel