[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] VT-d: correct dma_msi_set_affinity()



> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 3:30 PM
> 
> >>> On 13.12.16 at 06:23, <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>  From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 4:47 PM
> >>
> >> >>> On 08.12.16 at 18:33, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On 08/12/16 16:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> That commit ("VT-d: use msi_compose_msg()) together with 15aa6c6748
> >> >
> >> > Which commit?
> >>
> >> Oops - initially I had intended the title to include the hash: 83cd2038fe.
> >> I've adjusted the text.
> >>
> >> >> ("amd iommu: use base platform MSI implementation") introducing the use
> >> >> of a per-CPU scratch CPU mask went too far: dma_msi_set_affinity() may,
> >> >> at least in theory, be called in interrupt context, and hence the use
> >> >> of that scratch variable is not correct.
> >> >>
> >> >> Since the function overwrites the destination information anyway,
> >> >> allow msi_compose_msg() to be called with a NULL CPU mask, avoiding the
> >> >> use of that scratch variable.
> >> >
> >> > Which function overwrites what?  I can't see dma_msi_set_affinity()
> >> > doing anything to clobber msg.dest32, so I don't understand why this
> >> > change is correct.
> >>
> >> msg.dest32 simply isn't being used. msg is local to that function, so
> >> all that matters is which fields the function consumes. Is uses only
> >> address and data, and updates address to properly specify the
> >> intended destination. To guard against stale data (in
> >> iommu->msi.msg), it may be reasonable to nevertheless set dest32
> >> before storing msg into that field.
> >
> > So do you plan to send v2 or stick with current version?
> 
> Well, so far I haven't heard back from Andrew, and hence didn't
> plan on sending a v2 yet. If that addition is going to be the only
> adjustment, I'm also not sure sending a v2 is actually necessary.
> 

then reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.