[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] xen-livepatch: If hypervisor is not compiled with Livepatching
On 09/22/2016 11:12 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:25:33AM +0100, Ross Lagerwall wrote:On 09/21/2016 08:20 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:. print a better error code. Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c b/tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c index 2de04c0..f11e71f07f 100644 --- a/tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c +++ b/tools/misc/xen-livepatch.c @@ -100,8 +100,11 @@ static int list_func(int argc, char *argv[]) rc = xc_livepatch_list(xch, MAX_LEN, idx, info, name, len, &done, &left); if ( rc ) { - fprintf(stderr, "Failed to list %d/%d: %d(%s)!\n", - idx, left, errno, strerror(errno)); + if ( errno == ENOSYS ) + fprintf(stderr, "Hypervisor compiled without Xen Livepatching!\n"); + else + fprintf(stderr, "Failed to list %d/%d: %d(%s)!\n", + idx, left, errno, strerror(errno)); break; } if ( !idx )You should save errno since you have an fprintf before you check it.I am missing something. Why would fprintf mess up 'errno' ? If the first fprintf fails for whatever reason (e.g. ENOSPC), then it will set errno and the subsequent check of errno afterwards will serve no purpose. I have a patch to fix this issue for the rest of xen-livepatch.c, and will send it out shortly. -- Ross Lagerwall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |