Re: [Xen-devel] find_next{,_zero}_bit() inconsistencies

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 29/08/16 12:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> in the context of
> https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-08/msg03068.html
> I once again came across the different behavior our various
> implementations of the $subject functions, in particular their varying
> handling of the offset argument being greater / greater-or-equal
> the size argument. Shouldn't we settle on a single, uniform model,
> which might be
> 1) offset >= size is valid, returns size,
> 2) offset == size is valid, returns size, offset > size is invalid,
> 3) offset >= size is invalid.

What does the linux implementation do?

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel