[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08/24] xen: tracing: add trace records for schedule and rate-limiting.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As far as {csched, csched2, rt}_schedule() are concerned, > an "empty" event, would already make it easier to read and > understand a trace. > > But while there, add a few useful information, like > if the cpu that is going through the scheduler has > been tickled or not, if it is currently idle, etc > (they vary, on a per-scheduler basis). > > For Credit1 and Credit2, add a record about when > rate-limiting kicks in too. > > Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Meng Xu <mengxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/common/sched_credit.c | 7 +++++++ > xen/common/sched_credit2.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > xen/common/sched_rt.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/common/sched_rt.c b/xen/common/sched_rt.c > index 41c61a7..903dbd8 100644 > --- a/xen/common/sched_rt.c > +++ b/xen/common/sched_rt.c > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ > #define TRC_RTDS_BUDGET_BURN TRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 3) > #define TRC_RTDS_BUDGET_REPLENISH TRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 4) > #define TRC_RTDS_SCHED_TASKLET TRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 5) > +#define TRC_RTDS_SCHEDULE TRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 6) > > static void repl_timer_handler(void *data); > > @@ -1035,6 +1036,20 @@ rt_schedule(const struct scheduler *ops, s_time_t now, > bool_t tasklet_work_sched > struct rt_vcpu *snext = NULL; > struct task_slice ret = { .migrated = 0 }; > > + /* TRACE */ > + { > + struct __packed { > + unsigned cpu:17, tasklet:8, tickled:4, idle:4; > + } d; > + d.cpu = cpu; > + d.tasklet = tasklet_work_scheduled; > + d.tickled = cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &prv->tickled); > + d.idle = is_idle_vcpu(current); > + __trace_var(TRC_RTDS_SCHEDULE, 1, > + sizeof(d), > + (unsigned char *)&d); > + } I have two questions here: 1) IMHO, the trace should be wrapped by the if ( unlikely(tb_init_done) ) {} statement as done in sched_credit2.c. Otherwise, we always enable the tracing which may hurt the performance, I think. 2) Why does the cpu field here use 17 bits instead of 16 bits as used in credit2? This may be a typo I guess (since you are trying to align the structure to 32 bits I guess ;-) )? In addition, I'm wondering if uint16 is better than unsigned? I'm not that confident if unsigned type will always have 16 bits on all types of machines? Thanks, Meng ------------ Meng Xu PhD Student in Computer and Information Science University of Pennsylvania http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mengxu/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |