Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] libxl: make firmware_override able to cope with relative path

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/08/16 17:24, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] libxl: make firmware_override able to 
> cope with relative path"):
>> On 08/08/16 17:09, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> Discuss what should happen when the domain is subsequently migrated.
>>> (4 marks)
>> No change.
>>
>> In both of these cases, they are boot-time artefacts with no further
>> action on migrate; they live in the memory stream at that point.
> My example was disk images.

I fail to see why any question of disk image is relevant here.

My statement was about kernel=, ramdisk= and firmware_override=.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel