[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/22] xen/arm: p2m: Use the typesafe MFN in mfn_to_p2m_entry
Hi Stefano, On 27/07/2016 19:25, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Julien Grall wrote:Hi Stefano, On 26/07/16 23:28, Stefano Stabellini wrote:On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Julien Grall wrote:@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static int p2m_create_table(struct domain *d, lpae_t *entry, if ( splitting ) { p2m_type_t t = entry->p2m.type; - unsigned long base_pfn = entry->p2m.base; + mfn_t mfn = _mfn(entry->p2m.base); int i; /* @@ -420,8 +420,9 @@ static int p2m_create_table(struct domain *d, lpae_t *entry, */ for ( i=0 ; i < LPAE_ENTRIES; i++ ) { - pte = mfn_to_p2m_entry(base_pfn + (i<<(level_shift-LPAE_SHIFT)), - MATTR_MEM, t, p2m->default_access); + pte = mfn_to_p2m_entry(mfn, MATTR_MEM, t, p2m->default_access); + + mfn = mfn_add(mfn, 1UL << (level_shift - LPAE_SHIFT));Should we be incrementing mfn before calling mfn_to_p2m_entry?No. The base of the superpage is mfn, after splitting the first entry will be equal to the base, the second entry base + level_size...I understand what the patch is doing now, I confused "1" with "i" :-) The patch is OK. It might be more obvious as the following: for ( i=0 ; i < LPAE_ENTRIES; i++ ) { pte = mfn_to_p2m_entry(mfn_add(mfn, (i<<(level_shift-LPAE_SHIFT))), MATTR_MEM, t, p2m->default_access); However it's just a matter of taste, so I'll let you choose the way you prefer. I wanted to avoid shifting "i" at each loop (which should save an instruction). However, as it seems to be confusing, I will use your suggestion. Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Thank you! Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |