[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)
- To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:58:32 +0100
- Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anshul Makkar <anshul.makkar@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 14:58:42 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re:
[PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)"):
> Really? Is it that difficult to accept that the original project author
> gets to choose the name?
Yes.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614907#113
As I say, I think osstest has a far better claim to the name `Xen Test
Framework'. But I haven't called it that because I have an
understanding that namespace landgrabs are antisocial.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
