[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: arm64: Add support for Renesas RCar Gen3 H3 Salvator-X platform
On 07/07/16 13:43, Lars Kurth wrote: On 7 Jul 2016, at 12:28, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Also CC Lars. On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 12:12:52PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:(CC Wei for the release part) Hi Dirk, On 04/07/16 07:51, Dirk Behme wrote:Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Thank you for adding support of a new board in Xen. During the last hackathon, we discussed about improving pre-release testing on ARM hardware [1] and helping users to boot Xen on supported board. This patch is the first board officially supported since then, so I would like to start applying what was discussed (I will put on a wiki page later). Below the list of things that I would like to see when a new board is added: - Create a wiki page to explain the requirements to boot Xen on the board (e.g new firmware if not supported out of box, linux version,...); - Add a link to the new page in [2]; - Add the contact details in [3] of someone who would could test pre-release and help out users to boot Xen on the board. I do not expect the latter point to be time consuming. It is basically checking if Xen boots before each release and possibly update the requirements of the board. For the part helping users, it will mostly be question related to booting Xen on the hardware. Others may not be able to answer because they do not have the board on their desk.FWIW having some wiki pages, and most importantly contact details, would be a good starting point.I did actually create these pages during the Hackathon and sent it out to the list, but they were not populated by anyone. See http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_Manual_Smoke_Test http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_Manual_Smoke_Test/ResultsCan we also have a section in MAINTAINERS for different boards (or a dedicated file?) so that we can easily gather all contact and send emails in a batch when the release is near?I am not in principle against this, but a concrete proposal would need to be made. In fact that may be better than using the wiki (given the lack of traction around it) I think a file in the repository would be more formal than a wiki page.However, the MAINTAINERS file may not be the right place because some board will not have any specific code/file in Xen (e.g the RCAR-3 only add earlyprintk). But we would still want to keep track of them for testing purpose and advertising the board supported. I was thinking to add a file board under docs/misc/arm/boards.txt with the list of board and a contact associated I would add some words about the "responsibility" of the contact such as: - Testing - Answering questions related to the boardI would also keep the wiki page [1] (+ a link in the file) to log the testing result per release. Finally, we may want to track whether the board is "supported", "obsolete", "untested"... I will try to write a concrete proposal. Cheers, [1] http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_ARM_Manual_Smoke_Test/Results -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |