[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: correct return value checks on xenbus_scanf()

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <JGross@xxxxxxxx>
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:56:21 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 09:56:33 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 07/07/16 08:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Only a positive return value indicates success.

This checks were already correct.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: correct return value checks on xenbus_scanf()
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netback: prefer xenbus_scanf() over xenbus_gather()
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 4/6] arm/vm_event: get/set registers
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: correct return value checks on xenbus_scanf()
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 96739: regressions - FAIL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.