[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/8] x86/time: correctly honor late clearing of TSC related feature flags
>>> On 04.07.16 at 17:39, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20/06/16 16:20, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 20.06.16 at 16:32, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 15/06/16 11:28, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c >>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c >>>> @@ -1358,6 +1358,24 @@ static void time_calibration(void *unuse >>>> &r, 1); >>>> } >>>> >>>> +void __init clear_tsc_cap(unsigned int feature) >>>> +{ >>>> + void (*rendezvous_fn)(void *) = time_calibration_std_rendezvous; >>> This should read time_calibration_rendezvous_fn rather than assuming >>> time_calibration_std_rendezvous. >>> >>> Otherwise, there is a risk that it could be reset back to >>> time_calibration_std_rendezvous. >> But that's the purpose: We may need to switch back. > > Under what circumstances could we ever move from re-syncing back to not > re-syncing? verify_tsc_reliability() may result in X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE getting cleared. That's an initcall, which means it runs after init_xen_time(), and hence after the rendezvous function got established initially. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |