|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] Interface for grant copy operation in libs.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:37:24 +0100
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 22/06/16 09:38, Paulina Szubarczyk wrote:
> > In a linux part an ioctl(gntdev, IOCTL_GNTDEV_GRANT_COPY, ..)
> > system call is invoked. In mini-os the operation is yet not
> > implemented. For other OSs there is a dummy implementation.
> [...]
> > --- a/tools/libs/gnttab/linux.c
> > +++ b/tools/libs/gnttab/linux.c
> > @@ -235,6 +235,51 @@ int osdep_gnttab_unmap(xengnttab_handle *xgt,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +int osdep_gnttab_grant_copy(xengnttab_handle *xgt,
> > + uint32_t count,
> > + xengnttab_grant_copy_segment_t *segs)
> > +{
> > + int i, rc;
> > + int fd = xgt->fd;
> > + struct ioctl_gntdev_grant_copy copy;
> > +
> > + copy.segments = calloc(count, sizeof(struct
> > ioctl_gntdev_grant_copy_segment));
> > + copy.count = count;
> > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> > + {
> > + copy.segments[i].flags = segs[i].flags;
> > + copy.segments[i].len = segs[i].len;
> > + if (segs[i].flags == GNTCOPY_dest_gref)
> > + {
> > + copy.segments[i].dest.foreign.ref = segs[i].dest.foreign.ref;
> > + copy.segments[i].dest.foreign.domid =
> > segs[i].dest.foreign.domid;
> > + copy.segments[i].dest.foreign.offset =
> > segs[i].dest.foreign.offset;
> > + copy.segments[i].source.virt = segs[i].source.virt;
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> > + copy.segments[i].source.foreign.ref =
> > segs[i].source.foreign.ref;
> > + copy.segments[i].source.foreign.domid =
> > segs[i].source.foreign.domid;
> > + copy.segments[i].source.foreign.offset =
> > segs[i].source.foreign.offset;
> > + copy.segments[i].dest.virt = segs[i].dest.virt;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = ioctl(fd, IOCTL_GNTDEV_GRANT_COPY, ©);
> > + if (rc)
> > + {
> > + GTERROR(xgt->logger, "ioctl GRANT COPY failed %d ", errno);
> > + }
> > + else
> > + {
> > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> > + segs[i].status = copy.segments[i].status;
> > + }
> > +
> > + free(copy.segments);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
>
> I know Wei asked for this but you've replaced what should be a single
> pointer assignment with a memory allocation and two loops over all the
> segments.
>
> This is a hot path and the two structures (the libxengnttab one and the
> Linux kernel one) are both part of their respective ABIs and won't
> change so Wei's concern that they might change in the future is unfounded.
>
> This change makes xengnttab_grant_copy() useless for our (XenServer's)
> use case.
>
> David
As Wei and Ian are maintainers of toolstack if they agree on the previous cast
that was here I will revert the changes.
Paulina
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |