|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/HVM: don't calculate XSTATE area sizes in software
>>> On 01.06.16 at 17:35, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/06/16 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -3440,42 +3440,24 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig
>> *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
>> break;
>> }
>> - /* EBX value of main leaf 0 depends on enabled xsave features */
>> - if ( count == 0 && v->arch.xcr0 )
>> - {
>> - /* reset EBX to default value first */
>> - *ebx = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE;
>> - for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 63; sub_leaf++ )
>> - {
>> - if ( !(v->arch.xcr0 & (1ULL << sub_leaf)) )
>> - continue;
>> - domain_cpuid(d, input, sub_leaf, &_eax, &_ebx, &_ecx,
>> - &_edx);
>> - if ( (_eax + _ebx) > *ebx )
>> - *ebx = _eax + _ebx;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - if ( count == 1 )
>> + switch ( count )
>> {
>> + case 1:
>> *eax &= hvm_featureset[FEATURESET_Da1];
>> -
>> - if ( *eax & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) )
>> + if ( !(*eax & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)) )
>> {
>> - uint64_t xfeatures = v->arch.xcr0 |
>> v->arch.hvm_vcpu.msr_xss;
>> -
>> - *ebx = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE;
>> - if ( xfeatures & ~XSTATE_FP_SSE )
>> - for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 63; sub_leaf++ )
>> - if ( xfeatures & (1ULL << sub_leaf) )
>> - {
>> - if ( test_bit(sub_leaf, &xstate_align) )
>> - *ebx = ROUNDUP(*ebx, 64);
>> - *ebx += xstate_sizes[sub_leaf];
>> - }
>> - }
>> - else
>> *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + /* fall through */
>> + case 0:
>> + /*
>> + * Always read CPUID.0xD[ECX=0/1].EBX from hardware, rather than
>> + * domain policy. It varies with enabled xstate, and the
>> correct
>> + * xcr0/xss are in context.
>> + */
>> + cpuid_count(input, count, &dummy, ebx, &dummy, &dummy);
>> + break;
>
> It would be helpful for my PKU bugfix if you could avoid collapsing this
> into a fallthough, as the fallthough would need to be undone.
> Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Converting this back is easy to do, but I'll nevertheless wait for
Wei's opinion re 4.7 inclusion, as otherwise I'll eventually need to
rebase on top of yours anyway.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |