[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VMX: relax incoming BNDCFGS check

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:12:52 +0100
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:13:20 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 30/05/16 11:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Accepting zero here even when !cpu_has_mpx makes the restore side
> symmetric to the save logic (which avoids saving the value if zero),
> i.e. makes either side independent of the logic on the other side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VMX: relax incoming BNDCFGS check
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: xen-pciback: Remove create_workqueue
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] VMX: Properly handle pi descriptor and per-cpu blocking list
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VMX: relax incoming BNDCFGS check
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [RFC v2] Change dma_attrs from bitfield to unsigned long
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.