[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, locking: Remove ticket (spin)lock implementation

To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 10:07:12 +0100
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Waiman.Long@xxxxxxx, dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 May 2016 09:07:32 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 18/05/16 19:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> We've unconditionally used the queued spinlock for many releases now.
> 
> Its time to remove the old ticket lock code.

Xen parts:

Acked-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, locking: Remove ticket (spin)lock implementation
  - From: Peter Zijlstra

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 2/2] svm: iommu: Only call guest_iommu_init() after initialized HVM domain
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xenalyze: fix a spurious newline
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86, locking: Remove ticket (spin)lock implementation
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 94539: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.