Re: [Xen-devel] xen/arm: Assertion 'timer->status >= TIMER_STATUS_inactive' failed at timer.c:279

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 14:23 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:20:05PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Dario and George,
> > > 
> > > What is the status of this patch? It would be nice to have it for
> > > Xen 4.7 to
> > > avoid unwanted crash when secondary CPUs fails to come online.
> > Wei, can you put this on your release blockers list?  (Julien, I
> > take
> > it this should be a blocker, right?)
> > 
> It's already on my list.
> 
Here it comes, as a part of a small series:
 http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-05/msg00243.html

Sorry it took a bit but:
 1. I found a few other issues, an wanted to group them in a series;
 2. I tried to do what George asked, so document and put ASSERT()-s to
    make things clear and understandable.

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel