[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/16] x86/boot: do not create unwind tables

To: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:45:04 +0100
Cc: jgross@xxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx, pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx, ning.sun@xxxxxxxxx, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, qiaowei.ren@xxxxxxxxx, richard.l.maliszewski@xxxxxxxxx, gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx, fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:45:21 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 15/04/16 13:33, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> This way .eh_frame section is not included in *.lnk and *.bin files.
> Hence, final e.g. reloc.bin file size is reduced from 408 bytes to
> 272 bytes and it contains only used code and data.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

(Although this entire series is 4.8 material now)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: multiboot2 protocol support
  - From: Daniel Kiper
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/16] x86/boot: do not create unwind tables
  - From: Daniel Kiper

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] libxc: adjust retry loop in xc_cpupool_removecpu()
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 02/16] x86: zero BSS using stosl instead of stosb
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/16] x86/boot: do not create unwind tables
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 02/16] x86: zero BSS using stosl instead of stosb
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.