[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Data integrity extension support for xen-block

To: Bob Liu <bob.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:19:53 +0100
Cc: jgross@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx, Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:30:48 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Bob Liu writes ("Re: [RFC PATCH] Data integrity extension support for 
xen-block"):
> A simpler possible solution:

As a syntax this is certainly simpler and quite probably preferable.

But NB that I regard your email as simply a sketch of the syntax.  We
also need (as discussed) a statement of the semantics.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Data integrity extension support for xen-block
  - From: Bob Liu
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Data integrity extension support for xen-block
  - From: Bob Liu

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vm_event: Implement ARM SMC events
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [libvirt] Fixing libvirt's libxl driver breakage -- where to define LIBXL_API_VERSION?
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Data integrity extension support for xen-block
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Data integrity extension support for xen-block
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.