[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/11] Return failure on failure for more xl commands



I will resend them as soon as I managed to check it all once again.

At 22 April the decision of selected candidates is going to be posted.
During that time I should complete the bite-size task and according
to the https://wiki.gnome.org/Outreachy work on more contributions
if that is possible.

Paulina

On 31 March 2016 at 17:06, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:19:41PM +0200, Paulina Szubarczyk wrote:
>> Yes, I was looking at wrong branch, I am sorry. The patches
>>
>> * {01-04,08,11} were not attached in the previous patch [0].
>>
>> * {05,06} are applied in the version made by George Dunlap.
>>   I added the changes to return 0/1 in internal functions
>>   and EXIT_{SUCCESS/FAILURE} according to [2]. It certainly should be
>>   resend.
>>
>> * 07 was attached in the previous patch but is not applied in staging.
>>   It relates pci-* functions. I modified it as in the point higher.
>>
>> * 09 is applied.
>>
>> * 10 is not applied, I did not modified it. It brings coding style 
>> improvements.
>>
>
> Given that the applied patches interleave with not-yet-applied patches I
> think it's best if you can rebase on top of staging and resend.
>
> We shall look at it in due time. Note that we're currently quite busy so
> it might take us some time to get to your patches.  Do you have a
> deadline that you need to meet? Deadline for OPW etc?
>
> Wei.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.