[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 10/17] arm/xen: Get event-channel irq through HVM_PARAM when booting with ACPI
- To: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx
- From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:35:57 +0100
- Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, will.deacon@xxxxxxx, peter.huangpeng@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zhaoshenglong@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:36:18 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
Hi Shannon,
On 24/03/16 14:44, Shannon Zhao wrote:
When booting with ACPI, it could get the event-channel irq through
The kernel will always get the event-channel IRQ through
HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ.
So I would say: ", the kernel will get the event-channel..."
HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
index d94f726..680aae0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/time64.h>
#include <linux/timekeeping.h>
#include <linux/timekeeper_internal.h>
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
@@ -278,6 +279,35 @@ void __init xen_early_init(void)
add_preferred_console("hvc", 0, NULL);
}
+static void __init xen_acpi_guest_init(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ struct xen_hvm_param a;
+ int interrupt, trigger, polarity;
+
+ a.domid = DOMID_SELF;
+ a.index = HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ;
+ xen_events_irq = 0;
+
+ if (!HYPERVISOR_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_param, &a)) {
+ if ((a.value >> 56) == HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_TYPE_PPI) {
+ interrupt = a.value & 0xff;
+ trigger = ((a.value >> 8) & 0x1) ? ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE
+ : ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE;
+ polarity = ((a.value >> 8) & 0x2) ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW
+ : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
+ xen_events_irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, interrupt,
+ trigger, polarity);
+ }
+ }
Can you invert the condition to remove one layer of indentation?
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|