Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm/monitor vm-events: Implement guest-request support

[Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/26/2016 02:05 PM, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
> On 2/26/2016 1:56 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 26.02.16 at 12:07, <czuzu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/altp2m.h
>>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/altp2m.h
>>> @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
>>>    * this program; If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>>    */
>>>   -#ifndef _X86_ALTP2M_H
>>> -#define _X86_ALTP2M_H
>>> +#ifndef __ASM_X86_ALTP2M_H
>>> +#define __ASM_X86_ALTP2M_H
>> Unrelated change? (No need to undo, but please don't mix such
>> into patches especially when they are quite large already anyway.)
> 
> Noted.
> 
>>> @@ -33,5 +33,9 @@ void altp2m_vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v);
>>>   void altp2m_vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu *v);
>>>   void altp2m_vcpu_reset(struct vcpu *v);
>>>   -#endif /* _X86_ALTP2M_H */
>>> +static inline uint16_t altp2m_vcpu_idx(struct vcpu *v)
>> const
> 
> 'const', as in:
> 
> +static inline const uint16_t altp2m_vcpu_idx(struct vcpu *v)

Since there's no functional difference between returning const uint6_t
and plain uint16_t, I assume that Jan meant "const struct vcpu *v".


Cheers,
Razvan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel