[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 05/13] tools/libxc: support to resume uncooperative HVM guests
- To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 12:16:31 -0500
- Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>, Changlong Xie <xiecl.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jiang Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Dong Eddie <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yang Hongyang <hongyang.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:16:57 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
> > .. forbid what? PVHVM resuming with fast=0? Why? Because the guest may
> > fall on its face?
>
> Yes, forbid resuming PVHVM with fast=0 if we have no clear definition of
> how it works. It's not because guest would fall, it's because we can't
> tell which side (the guest or the toolstack) is buggy when the guest
> falls.
>
> But it looks like we (you ;-) ) have clear idea of how it works, we
> (you) just need to write it down.
Where? The header file where SHUTDOWN_suspend is introduced?
Or the libxc ones?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
