[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] tools: introduce parameter max_wp_ram_ranges.
- To: "Paul Durrant" <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang Yu" <yu.c.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 03:22:27 -0700
- Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Zhiyuan Lv <zhiyuan.lv@xxxxxxxxx>, IanJackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir \(Xen.org\)" <keir@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:22:38 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
>>> On 17.02.16 at 10:58, <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for the help. Let's see whether we can have some solution ready for
> 4.7. :-)
Since we now seem to all agree that a different approach is going to
be taken, I think we indeed should revert f5a32c5b8e ("x86/HVM:
differentiate IO/mem resources tracked by ioreq server"). Please
voice objections to the plan pretty soon.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
