Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] public/io/netif.h: make control ring hash protocol more general

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 16.02.16 at 16:00, <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> v3:
>   - Use XEN_NETIF_ prefix instead of NETIF_

Stale patch? Because I can't see this having happened ...

> @@ -206,10 +206,10 @@
>   * Buffer[0..8] = Packet[12..15] (source address) +
>   *                Packet[16..19] (destination address)
>   *
> - * Result = ToeplitzHash(Buffer, 8)
> + * Result = Hash(Buffer, 8)
>   */
> -#define _NETIF_CTRL_TOEPLITZ_HASH_IPV4     0
> -#define NETIF_CTRL_TOEPLITZ_HASH_IPV4      (1 << 
> _NETIF_CTRL_TOEPLITZ_HASH_IPV4)
> +#define _NETIF_CTRL_HASH_TYPE_IPV4 0
> +#define NETIF_CTRL_HASH_TYPE_IPV4 (1 << _NETIF_CTRL_HASH_TYPE_IPV4)

... here as well as further down.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel