Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/14] xen: sched: __runq_tickle takes a useless cpu parameter

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 11:14 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 07:33:34PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > as it is always acts on v->processor of the vcpu because
> > of which we are tickling.
> 
> s/because of which// ?
> 
Yeah, well, technically, as tickling means "raising the
SCHEDULE_SOFTIRQ on a pcpu", I tend to see and describe it as "we
tickled pcpu X because of vcpu k woke up".

But this may well be me, and I'm fine both keeping or killing that
"because of which".

> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
Thanks,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel