|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] minios: don't rely on specific page table allocation scheme
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:05:16PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Today mini-os is making assumptions how the page tables it is started
> with are being allocated. Especially it is using the number of page
> table frames to calculate which is the first unmapped pfn.
>
> Instead of relying on page table number assumptions just look into the
> page tables to find the first pfn not already mapped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
I ran both pv-grub-x86_{64,32} up to the point when grub menu was
shown -- That's beyond the point of the original crash.
I also ran mini-os 32 and 64 bit with this patch on toolstack without
large p2m series. They worked.
> ---
> arch/x86/mm.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> include/x86/arch_mm.h | 7 -------
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm.c b/arch/x86/mm.c
> index 9c6d1b8..5d7c006 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm.c
> @@ -200,8 +200,8 @@ static void build_pagetable(unsigned long *start_pfn,
> unsigned long *max_pfn)
> int count = 0;
> int rc;
>
> - pfn_to_map =
> - (start_info.nr_pt_frames - NOT_L1_FRAMES) * L1_PAGETABLE_ENTRIES;
> + pfn_to_map = (*start_pfn + L1_PAGETABLE_ENTRIES - 1) &
> + ~(L1_PAGETABLE_ENTRIES - 1);
>
> if ( *max_pfn >= virt_to_pfn(HYPERVISOR_VIRT_START) )
> {
> @@ -229,9 +229,15 @@ static void build_pagetable(unsigned long *start_pfn,
> unsigned long *max_pfn)
> #if defined(__x86_64__)
> offset = l4_table_offset(start_address);
> /* Need new L3 pt frame */
> - if ( !(start_address & L3_MASK) )
> - if ( need_pt_frame(start_address, L3_FRAME) )
> - new_pt_frame(&pt_pfn, pt_mfn, offset, L3_FRAME);
> + if ( !(tab[offset] & _PAGE_PRESENT) )
> + {
> + if ( !need_pt_frame(start_address, L3_FRAME) )
> + {
> + printk("ERROR: build_pagetable(): L3 frame not present\n");
> + do_exit();
> + }
> + new_pt_frame(&pt_pfn, pt_mfn, offset, L3_FRAME);
I'm not sure about this hunk and other similar hunks. Shouldn't this be
if ( need_pt_frame(start_address, L3_FRAME) )
new_pt_frame(&pt_pfn, pt_mfn, offset, L3_FRAME);
That is, just like before.
Wei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |