[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: use masking operation instead of test_bit for MCSF bits

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a follow of commit 90f2e2a307fc6a6258c39cc87b3b2bf9441c0fa7 "use
masking operation instead of test_bit for MCSF bits" where the ARM
changes were missing.

Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
index 880d0a6..1b0f9eb 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ void hypercall_cancel_continuation(void)
     struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
     struct mc_state *mcs = &current->mc_state;
 
-    if ( test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags) )
+    if ( mcs->flags & MCSF_in_multicall )
     {
         __clear_bit(_MCSF_call_preempted, &mcs->flags);
     }
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ unsigned long hypercall_create_continuation(
 
     va_start(args, format);
 
-    if ( test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags) )
+    if ( mcs->flags & MCSF_in_multicall )
     {
         __set_bit(_MCSF_call_preempted, &mcs->flags);
 
-- 
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel