Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] xen/hvm: introduce a fpu_uninitialised field to the CPU save record

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.11.15 at 12:00, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As for the problem at hand, I don't see what was wrong with v1.
> 
> Fundamentally, we have three different variations of the same structure;
> two of which require special compat handling.  Pretending otherwise is
> just silly.

And if we gain a few more additions, we'll end up with half a dozen
slightly different structure declarations in the public interface? If
you consider the first step (adding tsc_aux) a mistake, let's not
repeat the same mistake again (even if right now it might _seem_
to be reasonable to some of us).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel