[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86/paravirt: Fix baremetal paravirt MSR ops
- To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:37:20 +0200
- Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>, KVM list <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:37:12 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 04:32:53PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> There are plenty of non-architectural MSRs in use which don't have
> feature bits.
That's exactly what the "possible" adjective was supposed to represent.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
