Re: [Xen-devel] osstest breakage, now believed fixed (Was: Re: [xen-unstable test] 61379: trouble: blocked/broken)

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 13:43 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 12:55:25PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-09-06 at 16:49 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> > > flight 61379 xen-unstable real [real]
> > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/61379/
> > > 
> > > Failures and problems with tests :-(
> > > 
> > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > > including tests which could not be run:
> > >  build-armhf                   3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-armhf-xsm               3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-amd64-oldkern           3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-amd64-prev              3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-i386-oldkern            3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-amd64-xsm               3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-amd64-pvops             3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-i386-prev               3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-i386-pvops              3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-i386                    3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-i386-xsm                3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-amd64                   3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > >  build-armhf-pvops             3 host-install(3)         broken REGR. 
> > > vs. 61059
> > 
> > The cache/proxy had gotten itself into some weird state and was giving 
> > 404
> > for URLs which did in fact exist and which were insisted upon by the 
> > Debian
> > Installer.
> > 
> > Ian and I investigated a bit and the cache process has now been 
> > restarted
> > and seems to be running fine now. Flights will restart in the normal 
> > way.
> > 
> 
> I believe it's going to pick up the latest xen-unstable staging?

Flight 61521 seems to have picked up on a7b39c8bd6cb, yes.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel