Re: [Xen-devel] [Draft C] Boot ABI for HVM guests without a device-model

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 04.09.15 at 17:47, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> VCPUOP_initialize was never available to HVM guests, so I don't think
> changing the argument is a problem. However, I understand that for the
> sake of clarity overloading an hypercall this way is not the best
> practice. What about naming it VCPUOP_hvm_initialise?

Hmm, don't know, the more that we want it primarily for PVH.

> Would it make sense to add aliases to have:
> 
> #define VCPU_hvm_up VCPU_up
> #define VCPU_hvm_down VCPU_down
> #define VCPU_hvm_is_up VCPU_is_up
> 
> Just for symmetry reasons?

If using the above, maybe. But I'd be afraid of this just becoming
useless clutter.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel