[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 60785: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

To: "Ian Campbell" <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 04:05:51 -0600
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:06:02 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 03.09.15 at 11:47, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We perhaps ought to consider whether we think "migration broken with newer
> kernels" should be a blocker for 4.6.

I think we should, at least up until we're certain it's in fact a problem
in a Linux commit that simply got exposed by the tools side change.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 60785: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Kbuild and Kconfig
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Kbuild and Kconfig
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 60785: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-4.1 test] 60785: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.