[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Draft B] Boot ABI for HVM guests without a device-model
>>> On 26.08.15 at 13:48, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * tr: must be a 32-bit TSS (active) with a base of '0' and a limit of '0xFF'. Why 0xFF instead of 0x67? > struct hvm_start_info { > #define HVM_START_MAGIC_VALUE 0x336ec578 > uint32_t magic; /* Contains the magic value 0x336ec578 > */ > /* ("xEn3" with the 0x80 bit of the "E" > set).*/ > uint32_t flags; /* SIF_xxx flags. > */ > uint32_t cmdline_paddr; /* Physical address of the command line. > */ > uint32_t nr_modules; /* Number of modules passed to the kernel. > */ > uint32_t modlist_paddr; /* Physical address of an array of > */ > /* hvm_modlist_entry. > */ > }; > > struct hvm_modlist_entry { > uint64_t paddr; /* Physical address of the module. > */ > uint64_t size; /* Size of the module in bytes. > */ > }; Why is paddr 64-bit here, but 32-bit in both cases above? > This structure is guaranteed to always be placed in memory after the DYM "These structures are ..."? > loaded kernel and modules. There's no upper bound on the size of the > structure, users should be aware that it might cross a page boundary. How is there no size limit? It's (currently) 16 bytes, and I don't see why it would change. And even if - as implied by the previous comment - this also relates to struct hvm_start_info: Its size is fixed (and unlikely to change much) too. > Note that the boot protocol resembles the multiboot1 specification, > this is done so OSes with multiboot1 entry points can reuse those if > desired. Which raises the question why we don't make it multiboot1 as much as possible. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |