[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 10/11] dma: rename dma_*_writecombine() to dma_*_wc()
- To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:43:58 -0700
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, toshi.kani@xxxxxx, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, airlied@xxxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mst@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx, tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx, daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx, bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx, dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 20:44:27 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:48:37 +0200 "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 09:53:18AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Which kernel is this against? It has conflicts in 3 files with Linus's
> > latest:
> > v4.2-rc8.
>
> Sorry I based it on linux-next, will respin the rename patch onto
> tip/auto-latest
>
Doing that will make the patch kinda useless, because then the patch
will trash more mature work which is pending in linux-next, one week
before the merge window opens.
A better plan would be to base the patches on linux-next then wait for
4.3-rc1.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
