[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Design doc of adding ACPI support for arm64 on Xen - version 3

On 2015/8/14 23:17, Julien Grall wrote:
On 14/08/15 15:59, Shannon Zhao wrote:
2. Create minimal DT to pass required information to Dom0
The minimal DT mainly passes Dom0 bootargs, address and size of initrd
(if available), address and size of uefi system table, address and size
of uefi memory table, uefi-mmap-desc-size and uefi-mmap-desc-ver.

An example of the minimal DT:
/ {
     #address-cells = <2>;
     #size-cells = <1>;
     chosen {
         bootargs = "kernel=Image console=hvc0 earlycon=pl011,0x1c090000
root=/dev/vda2 rw rootfstype=ext4 init=/bin/sh acpi=force";
         linux,initrd-start = <0xXXXXXXXX>;
         linux,initrd-end = <0xXXXXXXXX>;
         linux,uefi-system-table = <0xXXXXXXXX>;
         linux,uefi-mmap-start = <0xXXXXXXXX>;
         linux,uefi-mmap-size = <0xXXXXXXXX>;
         linux,uefi-mmap-desc-size = <0xXXXXXXXX>;
         linux,uefi-mmap-desc-ver = <0xXXXXXXXX>;

For details loook at

I would have expect a summary on the discussion we had on the previous
thread [1].

Note that "linux,initrd-*" are well defined given that Xen, U-boot and
other bootloaders are using them. And IIRC, it's Linux specific.

Although, "linux,uefi-*" are not well defined (only used internally by
Linux betwen the EFI stub and the kernel) and we expect other OS to use
them in the future.

So I would prefer to the "linux," dropped for them.

Yes, I think it's good to drop the "linux," too. But if we drop the linux, would it impact the linux kernel booting with UEFI? And why we don't do it to Xen since Xen still uses "linux,"?


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.