Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 60673: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 04:07 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > 
> > > > On 14.08.15 at 11:14, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > flight 60673 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60673/ 
> > 
> > Regressions :-(
> > 
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> >  test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail 
> > REGR. vs. 60152
> 
> Iirc this same test has been failing here and there a number of times
> recently

FYI there is data about this sort of thing at
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/$test

e.g. 

http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/

and especially:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/ALL.html
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu/xen-4.4-testing.html

>  - is this a sign of some issue unrelated to the software under
> test?

it does seem to have been happening on this branch a lot since the colo
move. I think that is more likely to be down to the change in the
underlying hardware as to something wrong with the code.

OTOH The history for 4.5-testing and unstable shows a far lower
incidence that 4.4.

>  If so, I'd be inclined to suggest a force push based on this flight.

Overall I think I'm inclined to agree, I suppose your motive is that
you want to get 4.4.x+1 out the door and I don't think we should block
that over this issue.
> 
> Jan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel