[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V6 2/7] libxl_read_file_contents: add new entry to read sysfs file
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 06:35:23PM +0800, Chunyan Liu wrote: > Sysfs file has size=4096 but actual file content is less than that. > Current libxl_read_file_contents will treat it as error when file size > and actual file content differs, so reading sysfs file content with > this function always fails. > > Add a new entry libxl_read_sysfs_file_contents to handle sysfs file > specially. It would be used in later pvusb work. > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Liu <cyliu@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > Changes: > - read one more byte to check bigger size problem. > > tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h | 2 ++ > tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c | 51 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h b/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h > index 6013628..f98f089 100644 > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h > @@ -4001,6 +4001,8 @@ void libxl__bitmap_copy_best_effort(libxl__gc *gc, > libxl_bitmap *dptr, > > int libxl__count_physical_sockets(libxl__gc *gc, int *sockets); > #endif > +_hidden int libxl_read_sysfs_file_contents(libxl_ctx *ctx, const char > *filename, > + void **data_r, int *datalen_r); Indentation looks wrong. > > /* > * Local variables: > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c > index bfc9699..9234efb 100644 > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_utils.c > @@ -322,8 +322,10 @@ out: > return rc; > } > > -int libxl_read_file_contents(libxl_ctx *ctx, const char *filename, > - void **data_r, int *datalen_r) { > +static int libxl_read_file_contents_core(libxl_ctx *ctx, const char > *filename, > + void **data_r, int *datalen_r, > + bool tolerate_shrinking_file) > +{ > GC_INIT(ctx); > FILE *f = 0; > uint8_t *data = 0; > @@ -359,20 +361,34 @@ int libxl_read_file_contents(libxl_ctx *ctx, const char > *filename, > datalen = stab.st_size; > > if (stab.st_size && data_r) { > - data = malloc(datalen); > + data = malloc(datalen + 1); > if (!data) goto xe; > > - rs = fread(data, 1, datalen, f); > - if (rs != datalen) { > - if (ferror(f)) > + rs = fread(data, 1, datalen + 1, f); > + if (rs > datalen) { > + LOG(ERROR, "%s increased size while we were reading it", > + filename); > + goto xe; > + } > + > + if (rs < datalen) { > + if (ferror(f)) { > LOGE(ERROR, "failed to read %s", filename); > - else if (feof(f)) > - LOG(ERROR, "%s changed size while we were reading it", > - filename); > - else > + goto xe; > + } else if (feof(f)) { > + if (tolerate_shrinking_file) { > + datalen = rs; > + } else { > + LOG(ERROR, "%s shrunk size while we were reading it", > + filename); > + goto xe; > + } > + } else { > abort(); > - goto xe; > + } This is a bit bikeshedding, but you can leave "goto xe" out of two `if' to reduce patch size. > } > + > + data = realloc(data, datalen); Should check return value of realloc. The logic of this function reflects what has been discussed so far. Wei. > } > > if (fclose(f)) { > @@ -396,6 +412,19 @@ int libxl_read_file_contents(libxl_ctx *ctx, const char > *filename, > return e; > } > > +int libxl_read_file_contents(libxl_ctx *ctx, const char *filename, > + void **data_r, int *datalen_r) > +{ > + return libxl_read_file_contents_core(ctx, filename, data_r, datalen_r, > 0); > +} > + > +int libxl_read_sysfs_file_contents(libxl_ctx *ctx, const char *filename, > + void **data_r, int *datalen_r) > +{ > + return libxl_read_file_contents_core(ctx, filename, data_r, datalen_r, > 1); > +} > + > + > #define READ_WRITE_EXACTLY(rw, zero_is_eof, constdata) \ > \ > int libxl_##rw##_exactly(libxl_ctx *ctx, int fd, \ > -- > 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |