Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 59721: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2015-07-19 at 10:19 +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 59721 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59721/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install 
> fail REGR. vs. 58965

I think we have considered discounting i386 qemu-dm as a thing we care
about, in which case we could force push this change since this was the
only fail..


> 
> Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
>  test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386  3 host-install(3)         broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd  3 host-install(3)     broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386  3 host-install(3)       broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel  3 host-install(3)   broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 3 host-install(3) 
> broken pass in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl            3 host-install(3)           broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 3 host-install(3) broken pass 
> in 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  3 host-install(3)    broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64  3 host-install(3)    broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  3 host-install(3)      broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  3 host-install(3)      broken pass in 
> 59699
>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 14 guest-start.2     fail in 59699 pass in 
> 59721
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl           9 debian-install              fail pass in 
> 59699

Some of these host-install fails are a bit worrying, but not a blocker
to a forced push IMHO.

> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  21d9b079e53805b68047d60d28cde224d09bbb40
> baseline version:
>  xen                  c40317f11b3f05e7c06a2213560c8471081f2662
> 
> Last test of basis    58965  2015-06-29 02:08:30 Z   20 days
> Failing since         58974  2015-06-29 15:11:59 Z   19 days   25 attempts
> Testing same since    59681  2015-07-18 00:10:50 Z    1 days    3 attempts

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel