Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 --for 4.6 COLOPre 05/25] libxl/remus: introduce libxl__remus_setup

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 13:32 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote:
> 
> On 07/15/2015 07:26 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 15:45 +0800, Yang Hongyang wrote:
> >> Refactoring Remus setup by introducing libxl__remus_setup API.
> >> All Remus setup work are done in this function.
> >>
> >> Also remove the libxl__ prefix for static functions.
> >
> > There is a subtle behavioural change here, which is that if anything
> > which is now done in _setup fails then the result is a call to
> > dss->callback( ..,..,ERROR_FAIL) rather than _start returning
> > AO_CREATE_FAIL(ERROR_FAIL).
> >
> > I think this is probably a reasonable and correct change, but I think it
> > is worth mentioning in the commit log.
> 
> Yes, will update the commit log.
> 
> >
> > That said, I also wonder if the actual check for netbuffer_enabled (the
> > only such failure in practice) ought to be moved up such that it stays
> > in _start along with the other similar checks, i.e. _start would do:
> >
> >      if (libxl_defbool_val(info->netbuf) && !libxl__netbuffer_enabled(gc)) {
> >              LOG(ERROR, "Remus: No support for network buffering");
> >              rc = ERROR_FAIL;
> >              goto out;
> >          }
> 
> This check is for Remus only, we want to reuse _start for COLO, so anything
> related to Remus only should sit in libxl_remus.c.

Makes sense, thanks.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel