Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] remove now unnecessary gc from libxl__async_exec_start calls

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 30/06/15 09:55, Wen Congyang wrote:
> These were removed in commit f5f8400f.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/libxl/libxl_netbuffer.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_netbuffer.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_netbuffer.c
> index ff2d6c7..107e867 100644
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_netbuffer.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_netbuffer.c
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void nic_setup(libxl__egc *egc, 
> libxl__remus_device *dev)
>      }
>  
>      setup_async_exec(dev, "setup");
> -    rc = libxl__async_exec_start(gc, &dev->aodev.aes);
> +    rc = libxl__async_exec_start(&dev->aodev.aes);
>      if (rc)
>          goto out;
>  
> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static void nic_teardown(libxl__egc *egc, 
> libxl__remus_device *dev)
>  
>      setup_async_exec(dev, "teardown");
>  
> -    rc = libxl__async_exec_start(gc, &dev->aodev.aes);
> +    rc = libxl__async_exec_start(&dev->aodev.aes);
>      if (rc)
>          goto out;
>  

Can OSS test be updated to build the remus bits of libxl?  This failure
should not have been able to pass the push gate.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel