[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stableo

To: "Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 07:09:19 +0100
Cc: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@xxxxxxxxxx>, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:09:46 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 02.06.15 at 19:12, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>    - working with shadow code (which is what we use when migrating HVM
> guests). But the nice side-benefit is that we can then run PVH on
> machines without VMX or SVM support.

Without VMX/SVM? What's the H then in PVH? Or did you mean
without EPT/NPT?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stableo
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

References:
- [Xen-devel] RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stable
  - From: Roger Pau MonnÃ
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stable
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stableo
  - From: Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stableo
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/block: add multi-page ring support
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] dmar: device scope mem leak fix
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stableo
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: making the PVH 64bit ABI as stableo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.