Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 for Xen 4.6 0/4] Enabling XL to set per-VCPU parameters of a domain for RTDS scheduler

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 01.06.15 at 10:50, <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 09:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:36 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Most people put the Cc about the cut (---) which is fine too. It means
>> the history ends up recording who was copied on the patch, which isn't
>> necessarily a bad thing.
> 
> Right -- I would have thought that was useless information cluttering up
> the history, but I can see how it might actually be useful.  Should I
> start putting my CC's above the ---? :-)

And should I stop dropping them even when above the --- for
commit, which so far I've been doing as I don't consider this
particularly useful information (other then e.g. who might have
commented on a change without it being recorded in an Acked-by
or Reviewed-by tag)?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel