Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2 1/6] x86/hvm: don't include asm/spinlock.h

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 13/04/15 14:13, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 10/04/15 16:24, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 10/04/15 15:19, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> asm/spinlock.h should not be included directly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> s/asm/xen/g instead of a straight delete?
>>
>> Otherwise you are relying on pulling in xen/spinlock.h implicitly.
> None of these files declare a spinlock so getting the header implicitly
> is correct, IMO.

In which case, good riddance.

Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel