Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE and IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE configurable as flexible requirement about SW-IOMMU.

["Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@xxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 11:20 PM
> To: Wang, Xiaoming
> Cc: Jan Beulich; Liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx; lauraa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx; linux@xxxxxxxxxxx; Liu, Chuansheng; Zhang,
> Dongxing; takahiro.akashi@xxxxxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx; d.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxxxx; pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jkosina@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE and
> IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE configurable as flexible requirement about SW-
> IOMMU.
> 
> . snip..
> 
> > Format: { <int>,force,<int>,<int>} is suitable I think.
> > And fixing  "force" is follow the code design previously in
> setup_io_tlb_npages.
> 
> It is a bug. It should have been smart enough to deal with the 'force' being 
> in
> any order.
> 
> If you are willing to make a patch to fix this - either folded into this 
> patch I
> am responding to or as a seperate one - that would be most excellent!
> 
OK, I will try to make a patch to deal with the 'force'  in any order.
> However, I can also do it - but my plate is full so it will take me some time 
> to
> get to it.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel