Re: [Xen-devel] Regression due to d9581c7dcac15c02ad4d47c60c60f4d8f197db55 en/fb: allow xenfb initialization for hvm guest

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> > > I am afraid that Xend is still widespread enough that we need some way to
> > > deal with it.
> > > 
> > > The #idef hackery - while not a nice way can make this work.
> > > 
> > > Or we can add this in an header/function as a quirk.
> > > 
> > > boolean xen_pvfb_dont_init_quirk(void)
> > > {
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > 
> > I would be OK with having such a quirk without the ifdef (no xend has
> > been known to work on ARM anyway).
> >  
> > 
> > >   if (xen_running_on_version_or_later(4, 5) && xen_hvm_domain())
> > 
> > Shouldn't this be xen_running_on_version_or_earlier(4, 4)?
> > Xend has been removed in 4.5.
> 
> This all sounds pretty gross, but if it is the way folks want to go,
> shouldn't it try and determine that it is running on xend somehow
> instead of guessing based on version number? 4.4 had xl in it too for
> instance...

Right, so the secondary check would be to see if there is something
extra that Xend puts in the XenStore. And it looks to always
put 'protocol' in every device:

xm:
0 = ""
 protocol = "x86_32-abi"
 state = "1"
 backend-id = "0"
 backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/vfb/7/0"

While xl:
vfb = ""
 0 = ""
  backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/vfb/1/0"
  backend-id = "0"
  state = "1"


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel