[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: xen config changes v4

To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:08:39 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:09:48 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 26/02/15 04:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
> 
> So we are again in the situation that pv-drivers always imply the pvops
> kernel (PARAVIRT selected). I started the whole Kconfig rework to
> eliminate this dependency.

Yes.  Can you produce a series that just addresses this one issue.

In the absence of any concrete requirement for this big Kconfig reorg I
I don't think it is helpful.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: xen config changes v4
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

References:
- [Xen-devel] RFC: xen config changes v4
  - From: Luis R. Rodriguez
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: xen config changes v4
  - From: Juergen Gross

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] RFC: Automatically check xen's public headers for C++ pitfalls.
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/5] x86: allow specifying the NUMA nodes Dom0 should run on
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: xen config changes v4
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: xen config changes v4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.