Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 19/24] libxl: define LIBXL_HAVE_VNUMA

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 19/24] libxl: define LIBXL_HAVE_VNUMA"):
> Yes, something like that.  It would be better if the precise wording
> were more similar to that for the other HAVE macros.  How about:
> 
>    * If this is defined the type libxl_vnode_info exists, and a
>    * field 'vnuma_nodes' is present in libxl_domain_build_info.
> 
> or similar ?

BTW, this may seem picky, but it is much easier to quickly find the
relevant one out of a lot of textual descriptions if there aren't any
unnecessary differences.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel