[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 23/24] libxl: Add support for non-PCI passthrough
Hi Stefano, On 29/01/15 11:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c >> index 029d2e2..b7ef528 100644 >> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c >> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_create.c >> @@ -1430,6 +1430,16 @@ static void domcreate_attach_pci(libxl__egc *egc, >> libxl__multidev *multidev, > > I think you should at least rename domcreate_attach_pci to something > more generic, like domcreate_attach_dev. Actually I was planning to add a domcreate_attach_dtdev but I forgot about it. What the best approach for this? > >> } >> } >> >> + for (i = 0; i < d_config->num_dtdevs; i++) { >> + >> + ret = libxl__device_dt_add(gc, domid, &d_config->dtdevs[i]); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + LIBXL__LOG(ctx, LIBXL__LOG_ERROR, >> + "libxl__device_dt_add failed: %d\n", ret); >> + goto error_out; >> + } >> + } > > You are allowed to call xc_* functions from here. The > libxl__device_dt_add wrapper doesn't add much value. I would like to keep the wrapper. It's in sync with the PCI solution and it will avoid refactoring later for add new code. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |