[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl_set_memory_target: only remove videoram from absolute targets

On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 16:47 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > If the new target is relative to the current target, do not remove
> > videoram again: it has already been removed from the current target.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> How does this relate to "libxl_set_memory_target: retain the same maxmem
> offset on top of the current target"? Doesn't that also achieve the same
> aim, since maxmem accounts for vram but target doesn't?

The two patches are different: this one affects the memory target while
the other one affects maxmem. The only relationship is that this issue
was found out by looking at the other patch.

This patch didn't make it into 4.5 because although it is a bug fix, it
doesn't fix a regression compared to 4.4.

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.