Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] Enable vTPM subsystem on TPM 2.0

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Xu, Quan wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stefano Stabellini
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:37 PM
> > To: Xu, Quan
> > Cc: keir@xxxxxxx; ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx; stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > tim@xxxxxxx; ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Daniel De Graaf
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] Enable vTPM subsystem on TPM 2.0
> > 
> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Xu, Quan wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Daniel De Graaf [mailto:dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:28 AM
> > > > To: Xu, Quan; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx; ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keir@xxxxxxx; tim@xxxxxxx;
> > > > stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Enable vTPM subsystem on TPM 2.0
> > > >
> > > > On 01/15/2015 04:21 AM, Quan Xu wrote:
> > > > > This series of patch enable the virtual Trusted Platform Module
> > > > > (vTPM) subsystem for Xen on TPM 2.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Noted, functionality for a virtual guest operating system (a DomU)
> > > > > is still TPM 1.2. The main modifcation is on vtpmmgr-stubdom. The
> > > > > challenge is that TPM 2.0 is not backward compatible with TPM 1.2.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Updates from v3 all look good, all patches in this series:
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > PS: If you need to re-post this in the future, you should add that
> > > > line below the signed-off-by on the unchanged patches, so that it is
> > > > clear to the other Xen maintainers that only the changed/new patches 
> > > > need
> > my review.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > >
> > > Many thanks.
> > > For example:
> > >        Signed-off-by: Quan Xu <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >        Acked-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Right?
> > 
> > That is correct.
> 
> Stefano, Thanks. 
> Now this series of patch were Acked-by Daniel De Graaf 
> <dgdegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. could you also 
> Review them and give me some comments or feedback? Thanks. 

I am not sure if I am really the right person to give you feedback on it.
But I do trust Daniel's opinion on it.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel